image-generation 13

I maintain an LLM art style gallery - prompts to style any image I generate. Since I generate several comics, I added a comic category page that includes styles like: To generate these, I asked Claude: Here are some examples of image styles I've explored. <image-styles> "2D Animation": "2D flat animation style, clean vector lines, cel-shaded coloring, cartoon proportions" "3D Animation": "Modern 3D animation render, smooth surfaces, dramatic lighting, Octane render quality, cinematic depth" ... </image-styles> In the same vein, I'd like to explore **comic** styles. Create 30 popular comic / cartoon styles, aiming for diverse aesthetics and cultural influences. Name it concisely (1-2 words) based on the source, but the description should not reference the source directly (to avoid copyright issues). Focus on the visual characteristics that define each style. Pick those KEY visual elements that will subliminally evoke the style without explicitly naming it. … followed by: ...

STEP 1: I asked Nano Banana 2 (via Gemini Pro) to: Imagine and draw a photo that looks ultra realistic but on a closer look, is physically impossible, and can only exist because images are a 2D projection that we extrapolate into three dimensions. Avoid known / popular illusions or images of this kind, like Escher’s work, and create something truly original. Think and draw CAREFULLY! … six times, followed by “Suggest a name for this”. ...

AI image generation still has a long way to go. Here are two images generated by Gemini and ChatGPT from the same prompt: “Create a funny scrabble board of dysfunctional family relationships!” Gemini It’s probably showing off, with coffee stains, and spelling “DYSFUNCTIONAL” right. But “ABLOMY”? “PASSIAVE”? “RGUCT_SVA”? “SORDSP”? Most of the vertical letters are wrong. Some horizontals (“DTENSION”?) are off, too. Also: “Z” has 2 points? “C” has “C” points? “DOUBLE STTER SCORE”? “UUT SCORE SCORE” instead of “TRIPLE WORD SCORE”? ...

In 2001, I received a campus interview invitation from BCG. It opened like this: Dear Anand, We’d like to invite you to an interview on … We were impressed by your … … and went on to share 2-3 phrases about what they liked about my CV. A dozen of us got similar letters – each personalized! That was cool. Two decades later, I still remember it. It showed care and competence – care enough to personalize for each candidate, competence to pull it off at scale across campuses. ...

I use LLMs to create photos and comics. But they can generate any kind of illustration. So why limit ourselves? My problem is imagination: I know little about art. So, I asked ChatGPT, Claude, and DeepSeek: Suggest 10 unusual illustration styles that are not popular in social media yet but are visually striking. I would like to have an LLM create images in that style. For each of those, show me an (and link to) an online image in that style. ...

If I turned female, this is what I’d look like. gpt-image-1: “Make this person female with minimal changes.” Hm…. maybe… just as an experiment…? LinkedIn

If someone asked me, “What’s changed this year in LLMs”, here’s my list:" Prompt engineering is out. Evals are in. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7335146366681194496/ Hallucinations are fewer and solvable by double-checking. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7326902628490059776/ LLMs are great for throwaway code / tools. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7319277426029539329/ LLMs can analyze data. No more Excel. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7345062233996988417/ LLMs are good psychologists. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7326504476712808449/ Image generation is much better. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7304716144379076608/ LLMs can speak well enough to co-host a panel. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7283025621503356930/ … and create podcasts. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7326544867734540288/ But: LLMs are still not great at slides. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7311066572113002497/ LLMs still can’t follow a data visualization style guide. LLMs can’t yet create good sketch notes. Apr 2026: With Nano Banana, they can, and Nano Banana Pro doesn’t even make spelling mistakes. LLMs still draw bounding boxes as well as specialized models. ~Agents (LLMs running tools in a loop) can think only for 6 min. Apr 2026: With Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4, agents run for several hours independently. What’s on your list of things LLMs still can’t do? ...

I tried out GPT Image 1.5. It adds more contrast, ink, texture, detail, and polish. See https://sanand0.github.io/llmartstyle/?category=pop It’s more powerful when generating different infographic styles: https://sanand0.github.io/llmartstyle/?category=text But it’s still terrible at faces. Overall, better competition for Nano Banana. Not yet dethroning Nano Banana Pro for me. LinkedIn

I called a few movers in Chennai, including “Unicorn Packers & Movers”, listed at 7015580411. He couldn’t understand what I said. I said, “We’re shifting to a house in Mylapore,” and he asked, “Shifting house where in Hyderabad?” (The reason became clear later.) It seemed I had the wrong number, so I said, “No, sorry, we need someone else,” and hung up. His phone rage began. He called back and said, “Why did you wake me up and waste my time?” From his tone it was clear I couldn’t say anything helpful. From the quality of my signal it was clear I couldn’t have a meaningful conversation. So I just put the phone down without cutting it. ...

I figured I should spend a few hours on the native image generation bandwagon and push the bounds of my imagination. Here are some of my experiments with image generation on ChatGPT. Replacements: Replace the person with this image (after uploading a photo of Naveen) Sticker: Create a transparent comic-style sticker of a lady chef featuring this person happily cooking salad (after uploading a photo of my wife) Meme sticker: Create a transparent sticker of a Vadivelu meme Meme: Create an image of Vadivelu looking up from a well. No caption. Make it look like a frame from a Tamil film. Recipe: Invent a vegetarian dish that has NEVER been created. Describe the ingredients and procedure first. Then draw a mouth-watering image of the dish. (Another version) Infographics: Create a detailed comic infographic explaining the double slit experiment. Slides. Draw a beautiful infographic highlighting these 6 accessibility testing aspects, with apt icons and visuals. UI mockups. Draw the screenshot of a chat application incorporating these features: … Product ideation. Draw an iSuit designed by Apple and Iris van Herpen. Show multiple views showcasing all features. Then write a product description. Interior design. Draw a biophilic office where the ceiling is a mirrored hydroponic garden, reflecting lush greenery downward to create the illusion of working in a floating forest. Meeting room design. Draw a modern office with sound-absorbing ‘whisper walls’ covered in fractal patterns that visually dampen noise pollution while doubling as collaborative whiteboards. Restaurant design. Draw a marble dining table with a river flowing through it, serving conveyor belt sushi as the dishes float gently on the water on top of plates. A sentient toaster with googly eyes, riding a unicycle through a library. A painting painting itself, but it’s struggling with existential dread. Photo of a gym where people work out by lifting their own regrets. Here’s what I learnt. ...

Me: Let’s play pictionary. You draw. I’ll guess. ChatGPT: Sure! I’ll draw something for you. Give me a moment. ChatGPT: Here you go! What do you think it is? Me: House ...

This week, I learned: LLMs are so good that they can simulate Doom in real time. gamengen Val.town’s code generation system prompt uses https://maxm-imggenurl.web.val.run/the-description-of-your-image to dynamically generate images Practice for each thought: “What would make me change my mind? How likely is that?” Cursor uses speculative edits and a variety of other techniques to speed up code editing. ChatGPT does a better job at cartoon generation than even Flux.1

I heard a lot about the new image generation models last week. So, I tested to see what’s improved. I gave the prompt below to various image generation models – old and new. A Calvin and Hobbes strip. Calvin is boxing Hobbes, with a dialog bubble from Calvin, saying “Bring it on!” Stable Diffusion XL Lightning Stable Diffusion XL Base Dall-E API ...