S Anand

Similar to the embedding map of my blog posts, I created an embedding map of Calvin & Hobbes. It uses the same process as before. Video

When people ask me for connections, I share my LinkedIn data and ask them to pick. This week, three people asked for AI ideas. I shared my local content with AI coding agents and asked them to pick. STEP 1: Give access to content. I use a Dockerfile and script to isolate coding agents. To give access, I run: dev.sh -v /home/sanand/code/blog/:/home/sanand/code/blog/:ro \ -v /home/sanand/code/til:/home/sanand/code/til:ro \ -v /home/sanand/Dropbox/notes/transcripts:/home/sanand/Dropbox/notes/transcripts:ro This gives read-only access to my blog, things I learned, transcripts, and I can add more. (My transcripts are private, the rest are public.) ...

I’ve been using AI in my Tools in Data Science course for over two years - to teach AI, and using AI to teach. I told GitHub Copilot (prompt) to go through my transcripts, blog posts, code, and things I learned since 2024 to list my every experiment in AI education, rating it on importance and novelty. Here is the full list of my experiments. 1. Teach using exams and prompts, not content ⭐ Use exams to teach. The typical student is busy. They want grades, not learning. They’ll write the exams, but not read the content. So, I moved the course material into the questions. If they can answer the question, great. Skip the content. Use AI to generate the content. I used to write content. Then I linked to the best content online – it’s better than mine. Now, AI drafts comics, interactive explainers, and simulators. My job is to pick good topics and generate in good formats. Give them prompts directly. Skip the content! I generated them with prompts anyway. Give students the prompts directly. They can use better AI models, revise the prompts, and learn how to learn with AI. ⭐ Add an “Ask AI” button. Make it easy for students to use ChatGPT. Stop pretending that real-world problem solving is closed-book and solo. ⭐ Make test cases teach, not just grade. Automate the testing (with code or AI). Good test cases show students the kind of mistake they may - teaching them, not just grading them. That’s great for teachers to analyze, too. Test first, then teach from the mistakes. Let them solve problems first. Then teach them, focusing on what failed. AI does the work; humans handle what AI can’t. This lets us teach really useful skills based on real mistakes. 2. Make cheating pointless through design, not detection ...

While exploring resonant computing tools, I discovered SearXNG, a self-hostable metasearch engine, which aggregates results from multiple search engines. It lets you search using APIs without needing to buy API keys and without being tracked. Pretty useful for research, people discovery, etc. when combined with LLMs. Setting it up for API use seems easy (thought Gemini got it wrong twice): cat <<EOF > settings.yml use_default_settings: true server: secret_key: "local_dummy_secret_key_987654321" search: formats: - html - json EOF docker run -d \ -p 8080:8080 \ --name searxng \ -v "$(pwd)/settings.yml:/etc/searxng/settings.yml" \ -e "SEARXNG_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080/" \ -e "SEARXNG_SERVER_LIMITER=false" \ searxng/searxng Now, you can run: ...

I was at a panel on AI in SDLC at PyConf. Here’s the summary of my advice: Process Make AI your entire SDLC loop. Record client calls, feed them to a coding agent to directly build & deploy the solution. Record your prompts, run post-mortems, and distill them into SKILLS.md files for reuse. Prompting Ask AI to make output more reviewable. Don’t waste time reviewing unclear output. Prefer directional feedback (feeling, emotion, intent) over implementational. Also give AI freedom to do things its way. Learn from that - you’ll be surprised. Learning ...

Given how easy it is to create interactive explainers with LLMs, we should totally do more of these! For example, I read about “Adversarial Validation” in my Kaggle Notebooks exploration. It’s the first time I heard of it and I couldn’t understand it. So, I asked Gemini to create an interactive explainer: Create an interactive animated explainer to teach what adversarial validation is. Provide sample code only at the end. Keep the bulk of the explainer focused on explaining the concept in simple language. ELI15 ...

People often email me questions they could have answered with ChatGPT. I just copy-paste the question, copy-paste the answer. This isn’t new. From 1998-2005, I used to do this Google searches. Even people who have Google Maps on their phone ask me for directions. I pull out my Google Maps and tell them. They don’t even get the sarcasm. Effectively, I’m the Human-as-an-Interface (HAAI everyone!) But I learnt today that this has historical precedent. Doormen, lift operators, doormen, the waiter who recites the menu, the secretary we used to dictate to, … ...

Software naming has power. I first became aware of this when a friend commented how much he enjoyed starting Windows 3. “Win,” he said. “I just love typing that!” I felt this this again recently with just. just lint Can you feel it? just build Actually, I just like to say “Just…” just test

I was a panelist at the PyConf Hyderabad AI in SDLC - Panel Discussion. After that, one of the volunteers asked for a video interview. “How was the panel discussion?” he asked. Ever since I started using AI actively, my brain doesn’t work without it. So, instead of an eloquent answer, I said, “Good.” He tried again. “Um… how did you feel about it?” he asked. I searched for my feelings. Again, fairly empty in the absence of AI. “Good,” I said again. ...

Yesterday, I was part of an IIM Bangalore interview panel at Hyderabad, along with Professor Subhabrata Das and Debajyoti. Panels typically comprise of two faculty and an alumni, and handle 8 interviews in the morning and eight in the evening, though in our case, we had 9 each. As we arrived, we were given a USB drive with the student’s resume, statement of purpose, and other documents that they had submitted, which included employment contracts, declarations, letters of recommendation, etc., depending on the student. Each interview was approximately 20 minutes. Luckily, Dr Das set a timer for 18, so we didn’t go too far beyond. ...