I examine philosophical proofs for God's existence, including Descartes' 'Cogito, ergo sum' and the Watchmaker Argument, but I find that I prefer relying on faith rather than logical proofs like those countered by Richard Dawkins.
Prove God exists. Descartes proved it by assuming that ‘Cogito, ergo sum’. ProofGodExists.com uses what’s called the Watchmaker Argument – that there can be no watch without a watchmaker. Richard Dawkins countered that beautifully in The Blind Watchmaker. Now, I’m a religious guy and all that. But I’d rather take God on faith than proof, OK?
I highlight a video claiming the banana's ergonomic features prove God's existence. It's a classic example of a literal teleological argument, and I was struck by how serious the proponents seemed to be.
I shared news questioning the Higgs boson's existence after CERN researchers struggled to find evidence for the "God particle." This late 2001 report highlights the scientific uncertainty surrounding the Standard Model and the search for fundamental particles.
I discovered First and Second, a massive Indian online bookstore that stocks Richard Dawkins titles unavailable elsewhere. I received my order in just two days, making them a remarkably efficient resource for readers in India.
I'm sharing saysgod.com, a site where God has apparently become quite talkative. It serves as a brief pointer to a humorous piece of early 2000s internet satire that was making the rounds in the blogging community.
I explored a collection of false mathematical proofs and found that I misidentified almost all of them. These examples highlight common logical traps in algebra and calculus, such as hidden divisions by zero.
Comments
Clare McIntaggart19 Feb 2007 12:19 pm:
regardless of my religious convictions Descartes reasoning was flawed when he ‘proved’ the exsistance of god. flawed for many reasons which only one of was the lack of applying his own method of doubt.
Comments