2026

I have a GitHub Education since I teach at IITM. But if I switch back to a free account, how much would I need to pay? I asked Codex (5.3, xhigh): My GITHUB_TOKEN is in .env. Go through my GitHub billing. Ignore the $100 sponsorships I make. Other than that, my current metered usage is $6.71 for Feb 2026 (which is included in my billing plan). $0.35 comes from sanand0/exam and $0.34 from sanand0/blog and so on. That’s coming mostly from “Actions Linux”, occasionally “Actions Storage”. Pick a few of the top repos and tell me what I should do to make the cost zero - or reduce the cost as much as possible. See if there’s a pattern across repos. ...

Kanata might be the most useful tool I can’t find a use for. It’s a cross-platform keyboard mapper. Some cool features: Make any key a modifier. Ctrl, Shift, Alt, etc. are modifiers. But we can make it so that pressing Space + I/J/K/L maps to Up/Left/Down/Right. Chords. You can map any sequence of keys to anything else. For example, Alt + G, then C can type git commit -m"Experimenting" [ENTER]. Ctrl + M, then Down, can reduce the music volume by 10%. Toggles. Double-clicking Caps Lock activates capitalization for the current word, and once you type a non-letter, it turns off. Or double-clicking Ctrl can turn on “gaming mode” where WASD becomes arrow keys, and double-clicking again turns it off. Tap Dance. Double-clicking left-shift can turn on Caps Lock. Triple-clicking turns it off. Quadruple-clicking … … and there’s lots more. ...

My current favorite prompt fragment is the expert lens: Think like an expert. In this context: - What patterns would an expert in this field check / recognize that beginners would miss? - What questions would an expert ask that a beginner would not know to? - What problems / failures would an expert anticipate that beginners may not be aware of? - How would an expert analyze this? At each step, explain what they are looking for and why. When I add this to my questions, if feels a lot smarter. ...

I recorded a short screen cast of a demo I built. It was ~900KB - way too large to publish as a thumbnail. So I asked ChatGPT: What’s the best equivalent of squoosh.app for WEBM compression? I’m looking for a free modern high-quality online video compressor. There are a few, and they compressed it to a third of its size, but 300KB is still too large. So I attached the original and asked: ...

It’s not every day your daughter turns 20. But it is nearly every day that annoying commitments stop you from doing important things - like buying the birthday cake and candles - especially when my wife is traveling. So, late at night, after useless meetings and well after when shops close, I asked Claude (the most creative of the lot): I have bread, Nutella, peanut butter, jam, and the usual household supplies. How can I celebrate my daughter’s 20th birthday with a birthday cake using stuff like these? Any creative ideas? ...

Recently, I’ve re-used my own writing / transcripts as context to LLMs. For example, I’ve used: My meeting transcripts to answer interview questions My blog posts to write news articles My chat history to extract AI-related advice This repurposing can be used for so many things. For example, before delivering a talk to journalists “Review my Feb 2026 LLM posts and generate a single-sentence, ELI15 high-impact use case for journalists.” gets me list of use cases. Now, all I have to do is show what I did and share how it’s relevant for them, like: ...

Our brains remember some things better. Explaining that way makes it stick. Here are the eight things, most important first, that help you: Structure explanations memorably: Face. You remember faces before facts. So cast characters: “Imagine you’re a courier carrying a packet.” Prefer archetypes to real names — less baggage, more imagination. Place. You’re reading down a list now — and the top feels more important. That’s spatial wiring. Turn any concept into a map. Use higher, deeper, nearer, inside, … Tale. You read #1 and #2 first because they came first. Your brain built a cause from that sequence. Time creates cause for free. “Because” makes anything believable. Scale. “Two feet tall” lands instantly. “60 cm” forces you to convert. Your brain doesn’t measure — it compares. Give it reference objects, not just numbers. Deliver explanations memorably: ...

Priyanka was ghost-writing an interview request from PC Quest for Ankor. Two questions were a bit technical: Straive combines data engineering, analytics, AI, and content services. At a technical level, how are enterprises stitching these capabilities together architecturally and operationally when addressing complex business problems at scale? GenAI systems tend to behave unpredictably when exposed to real workloads. What engineering patterns, monitoring approaches, or runtime safeguards are becoming essential to maintain reliability, performance, and cost control in production settings? … and she asked if I could review. ...

In Feb 2024, Claude 3 Opus was the best model, at $15/MTok. In Jul 2024, GPT 4o Mini reached that quality at 10% of the price. In Dec 2024, DeepSeek v3 reached that quality at 1% of the price. Video See the interactive version If the price continues to fall 10x every 11-12 months or so (and it has been), then in a year, a Claude 4.6 Opus like model will cost 1/10th of the $5/MTok today, and in 2 years, 1/100th of that. ...

I got an email from Google Cloud on my work account “excited to introduce you to Gemini Enterprise”. Once I signed up, it said, “you have 30 days to try Gemini Enterprise – Business edition at no cost.” After that, it costs US $21/user/month, which I can subscribe to here. The main differences from Gemini Pro (consumer accounts) seem to be: Data Privacy. Google won’t read or use your data to train. (In Pro, you need to turn it off explicitly. Here, it’s the default.) Admin Controls. Admins can turn off connectors, manage users, retention policies, etc. Copyright Indemnification. If AI infringes copyright and you get sued, Google will find the case. But if you’re using Gemini via your Google Workspace account (i.e. your work account already has Pro subscription), then it makes no difference - it’s all the same. ...

High Scepticism + High Humility = Scientist. Editor. Indecisive. “Let’s test it.” Good for high-stakes, irreversible decisions. System 2 thinking is slow and effortful. But if you do this too often or too long, you miss the window or other opportunities. High Scepticism + Low Humility = Critic. Troll. Red Hat. “You are wrong.” Good for stress-testing and auditing. To prevent/anticipate failures. But it’s toxic and demoralizing if you do it too much. ...

I have a bad memory. (I need to write about that. I k eep forgetting to.) It’s worsening. Yesterday, I misplaced my debit card for the first time. Or maybe the second…? Which reminds me, I just forgot a call I have now! (Panic.) (15 min later.) So, anyway, therefore, I log stuff meticulously. Like what I did each day, what I ate, what I weigh, what pained me, etc. But the best logging is automated. My phone logs where I am. My bank logs what I spend. My calendar logs who I meet. ...

You can use AI to submit not just talk proposals but entire articles from your past work. Ranjeeta said Built In wants an article and had written one on my behalf. If someone’s going to write for me, I’d rather pick an AI! So here’s what I did: Research the audience So I asked Gemini to research and suggest topics: I received a request to write an article for Built In (https://builtin.com/), an online community and publication for startups and tech companies. ...

Developing taste & judgement are an essential skill in the AI era. # # But taste is different from knowledge and takes more time. Gaining knowledge is a software upgrade. It strengthens existing synapses. It’s fast, reversible, no new “cables” required. Taste is a hardware upgrade. It destroys inefficient pathways, grows neurons for new pathways, and wraps axons with myelin speeding up signals 100x. (London cab drivers literally have a larger hippocampus.) Taste takes time. How we acquire taste depends on the environment. ...

10:20 am. After submitting my VizChitra 2026 talk proposal, did a quick analysis of the submissions. Copy the HTML from the submissions page and paste into Gemini. Ask it: “Given this HTML, share a JS snippet I can copy and paste into DevTools that will return an array of objects containing all the useful information about each submission.” Paste the JS snippet into DevTools and get the structured result. Here’s the breakdown of submissions (excluding exchibitions): ...

My last two presentations used browser tabs as slides. For my talk last week titled Your Chotu Is Smarter Than You Think, I planned to show a series of examples. I loaded them all in a browser window as tabs like this: How I use AI to navigate toilets How I use AI for food recommendation How I use AI for book suggestions What else I can use AI for … Once loaded, I can press Ctrl+PgDn to move to the next - just like I’d press the right arrow key in a slide deck. I can also use the mouse to click on the tab if I want to jump around. ...

Here’s my talk proposal for VizChitra 2026: Description There’s stuff I know AI can do. Create data visualizations. I just tell it to convert a dataset into a treemap, and it does. Hallucinate. That’s a fancy word for “make stuff up”. I prefer calling it “creativity”. Run forever. As long as I have token budget and can summarize the context, it can go on. What if we combine these? What if we asked it to do research? If infinite monkeys will almost surely produce Shakespeare, how long will it take for the greatest AI to discover a truly novel data visualization that is useful? ...

This week, Namit and I met a Straive team that operates from a client office. One team member asked: I believe that we are doing wonders out here, but we are closed from what is happening in the rest our organization. I want team members to interact with others to see what interesting things they have delivered and where we can implement that solution. Could we have sessions, maybe a monthly newsletter, showing what innovations we’re working on? This would really keep us engaged with the tech that is going outside of the work that we do. ...

Whenever “let’s set up a recurring meeting” comes up (from me or others), I add: “We’ll set it up 4 sessions and then finalize the cadence.” Why? Most recurring meetings are about: I want to do something Not sure what But I really want it, like long-term And I my future self might not follow through So my present self is going to force my future self with a long-term commitment But during the recurring meetings, my future self is usually asking: ...

One of my goals this year is to “Automate finance + tax”. Today, I took a baby step by organizing my expenses. This is my current process: STEP 1: Download PDF receipts (from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and other cloud/AI services) STEP 2: Organize them, so I know which receipt to upload against which expense STEP 3: Submit on SAP Concur. All steps are manual as of now. I automated STEP 2: Organize them. ...