MIT students wrote a tiny seven-line program to unscramble protected DVDs, sparking a landmark legal debate over whether source code should be legally protected as a form of freedom of expression.
Two MIT students have written a 7-line program that unscrambles protected DVDs. It’s downloadable. The legal issue is whether source code deserves protection on par with freedom of expression.
I shared a surprising report that writing software to pirate DVDs is legally protected. It’s an interesting piece of history regarding the early legal battles over encryption bypass tools and developer freedom.
I'm noting that a California court ruled the distribution of DeCSS is protected speech. This preliminary decision suggests that DVD decryption code may be legally shared despite trade secret and DMCA challenges regarding copy protection.
I note that Netflix doesn't charge customers for DVDs lost in the mail. I wonder if they have special legal rights to copy discs to replace transit losses, which would make this generous policy more sustainable.
This legal conundrum explores whether corporate PR responses to public criticism, specifically Nike's response to sweatshop allegations, should be classified as commercial advertising or protected free speech under the First Amendment.
I highlighted a discussion about the freedom to license software, focusing on how different legal frameworks impact developers. It’s an exploration of the choices we have when deciding how to share and protect our code.