
In meetings, I pass on questions to ChatGPT and I read out the response. But I’ve stopped saying “I’m reading that from ChatGPT.”
(By “ChatGPT”, I mean ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, Meta, etc. I happen to use ChatGPT with O3 Mini + Search.)
Use ChatGPT in meetings
It’s good to bring ChatGPT into conversations. (Or any activity where intelligence helps, actually.)
In meetings (online or in person), I keep a ChatGPT window open. When asked:
- “What’ll you have, Anand?” (at restaurants)
- “How can doctors use LLMs?”
- “Will you review this technical architecture?”
If I know the answer, I’ll give it. If not, I ask ChatGPT. (Ideally, I should ask even if I think I know the answer.)
For example:
- Sharing the menu photo and ask, “List vegetarian options. Suggest innovative dishes I’ll like.” (This works because I’ve shared my preferences and history with ChatGPT.)
- “How can doctors use LLMs in day-to-day work?”
- Sharing a picture of the architecture, “Explain this architecture to a blind expert. Critique with strengths, critical issues, and optional improvements.”
I’ve learnt that:
- Note-taking helps. I touch-type (without looking). I copy-paste the notes and their question to the LLM.
- Short questions are fine. Newer models understand cryptic questions.
- Say “Give me 30 seconds”. People assume you’re thinking deeply.
Read the response your way
I just read out the response – but with some changes.
- Change style. I read quicky, internalize, and say it in my style. Instead of “1. Clinical Documentation & Administrative Support”, I’d say, “Doctors can use it for note-taking.”
- Filter content. I skip stuff I don’t get or like. I might miss stuff, but when I speak, it’s my opinion I represent.
- Add context. I add personal stories to make it real, if I can. “GPs I know are worried LLMs diagnose better than they do” is something LLMs may not have learnt yet.
Don’t say you’re reading from ChatGPT
I used to tell people, “… and I just read that out from ChatGPT.” Their response is always:
- Disbelief for a moment.
- Amazement that models are so good.
- Dismissal of what I said, since it’s not “real”. (This is the sad part.)
I stopped saying that because
- I don’t need to. I can promote LLMs elsewhere.
- It’s not true. I re-style, filter, add context. It’s my response. My responsibility.
I’d rather deliver useful ideas than show where they come from. And if they think I’m a genius? Fine by me 🙂