I deliver about 3-5 talks a month and usually prepare for them. Thanks to AI (but even otherwise), I have a steady stream of new content. So, I just to assemble the story. For example, in my TEDx Whitefield talk “Prisoners of Birth”, I shared the impact of name, gender, lineage, place, and time of birth. I didn’t execute any new analysis. I just cherry-picked disparate analyses into a theme. (Took me three days to plan, though.) ...

At Changi Airport, I arrived 2.5 hours early and was worried that the flight was boarding on time - because I wanted to charge my laptop so it would work longer on a 6-hour flight to Delhi. I was also sad that it was only a 6-hour flight Delhi - it won’t be enough to read all my pending reading material. The only time I get to read stuff (instead of vibe-coding) is on a flight, with no WiFi. ...

Tools in Data Science has a remote online exam (ROE). It has a tough reputation. We conducted one today. Here’s how today’s ROE unfolded. The TAs had created 13 questions and shared it with me yesterday. This morning, I tried solving them. At first glance, it looked scarily hard! But I just jumpted down a few questions, and found that five questions were trivial, i.e. I just used the “Ask AI” button to copy the question into ChatGPT and it gave me the answer. ...

I asked ChatGPT to research universities’ AI policies. Here is the report Here are the four lessons I learned from that - about how to use AI for research. 1. Show examples of failures to avoid. Jivraj’s earlier research kept surfacing AI policies universities had researched, not written for themselves!. So I told ChatGPT to: … double-check that they ARE, in fact, about their own use of AI - not policies they’re proposing for others or are researching. ...

I researched the AI policies across 25 universities. In the last 6 months, I conducted sessions at three of these Universities: IIT Madras, Singapore University of Technology and Design, and Ashoka University. Interestingly, these are the three lowest ranked universities in my analysis of AI policies. This is where I’m glad that correlation does not imply causation.

TDS Project 1 wasn’t just a student project. It was a research and social experiment, too. We tested two skills - analytics and design. The design tests were diverse – and students fared worse there. Design may matter more in the AI era, and I’m glad some designs are brilliant. (But not diverse/creative enough.) I also learnt that Gemini beats Midjourney, which beats ChatGPT for image generation. I asked them to contribute to open source. Most PRs were trivial. But five students made a real difference. For example, this PR to Marimo is excellent! ...

I was watching Vaa Vaathiyar which has a short clip of MGR speaking. It’s either AI-generated or mimic-ed and it wasn’t bad. I used ffmpeg to record the audio from the film, transcribed it via Gemini 3 Pro on AI Studio with the prompt: Transcribe this into Tamil … which gave me: ராமு… என்ன செய்திருக்கிறாய் நீ… வாத்தியார் கேட்கிறேன் சொல் நிமிர்ந்து பார்க்க கூட தைரியம் இல்லையா… ஓடாதே… நில்… Translation: Ramu… What have you done… Vaathiyar (MGR) is asking, tell me Don’t you have the courage to stand up and look at me… Don’t run… stop… ...

Terence Tao said, “We haven’t done many experiments … large-scale studies where we take a thousand problems and just test them.” So I told Claude: You know my style. Suggest some innovative experiments I could run. The first suggestion was cool! The Polya Audit. Polya’s How to Solve It lists 20 heuristics (work backwards, induction, analogy, etc.). Mathematicians treat these as wisdom. Nobody has ever measured which ones actually work, and on what problem types. ...

Last Friday, 20 Mar 2026, this “Hack of the Day” was published by The Times of India. My agents generated it entirely automatically. Here’s how that happened. On 12 Feb 2026, I met Rohit Saran, Managing Editor at The Times of India. “Our biggest challenge is the starting challenge. What story to do?” he said. “We waste a lot of time and we starve stories because of this.” What if AI could help with that? We talked for nearly two hours - and left asking: “Should we do just a daily visual newspaper?” ...

I’ve been reading books using AI. Today, I used Gemini while watching a TV show. (Not to watch TV - just while watching TV.) There’s this scene in Iru Dhuruvam Season 2 with a sheet of paper with Tamil text on it. The script was small and I couldn’t read it clearly. (I’m pretty slow at reading Tamil anyway.) So I took a screenshot (Linux is great that way - you can record screenshots from any video player) and asked Gemini: ...

Based on several (i.e. two) recommendations, I subscribed to MiniMax. At $10/month, you get 1,500 requests every 5 hours and 15,000 every week. That’s a LOT! Using the same prompt I had Claude Code generate two data stories: The first paragraph, by Claude Sonnet 4.6 The first paragraph, by MiniMax M2.7 Here’s my comparison of the two. It’s partly based on Claude Opus 4.6’s comparison but I felt the same way. ...

Increasingly, I use coding agents instead of writing software. For example, I built a Blog UMAP. Then, I built Calvin UMAP. And more. But instead of building re-usable software, I just ran Claude with prior context. Increasingly, I use coding agents to run software. For example, I use Codex to classify my expense receipts. It writes re-usable code, but I run it using Codex, and it updates the code with new/edge cases. ...

I kept hearing that with the Nov 2025 release of Opus 4.5 and GPT 5.2 Codex, ex-coders were sprinting back to coding. On a sample of ~1,700 developers on GitHub, exactly ten fit the “dormant returner” profile. Here are a couple of examples: But they’re the exception. I could find only TEN out of 1,700 developers who returned. I also found a few who exited: To be fair, the vibe coding revolution is real, but maybe we are (I am) mis-interpreting it. ...

I spoke today on Design in the Age of Infinite Generativity at the Chennai Design Festival. You can read about the talk in the link about. This post is about my preparation. Tue 10 Mar 2026. Damn! Palani’s asked for the topic. Claude, what should I talk about!? Fri 20 Mar 2026. ChatGPT, tell me who the other speaker are. Fri 20 Mar 2026. Oh, I’ll just pull a bunch of links, use browser tabs as slides, create some slide dividers, and I’m ready! Sat 21 Mar 2026 1:00 pm. I’m NOT ready! The story doesn’t flow. It’s rubbish. Sat 21 Mar 2026 3:00 pm. Let me drop some of the boring ones. I just have 15 minutes. Sat 22 Mar 2026 3:30 pm. Oh, maybe I should listen to what the others are saying, just… you know… … and that proved the best decision ever, because Senthil of Payir showed a re-usable fabric calendar that converts into a bag. It was a fantastic idea, so I got curious. ...

Similar to the embedding map of my blog posts, I created an embedding map of Calvin & Hobbes. It uses the same process as before. Video

I’ve been using AI in my Tools in Data Science course for over two years - to teach AI, and using AI to teach. I told GitHub Copilot (prompt) to go through my transcripts, blog posts, code, and things I learned since 2024 to list my every experiment in AI education, rating it on importance and novelty. Here is the full list of my experiments. 1. Teach using exams and prompts, not content ⭐ Use exams to teach. The typical student is busy. They want grades, not learning. They’ll write the exams, but not read the content. So, I moved the course material into the questions. If they can answer the question, great. Skip the content. Use AI to generate the content. I used to write content. Then I linked to the best content online – it’s better than mine. Now, AI drafts comics, interactive explainers, and simulators. My job is to pick good topics and generate in good formats. Give them prompts directly. Skip the content! I generated them with prompts anyway. Give students the prompts directly. They can use better AI models, revise the prompts, and learn how to learn with AI. ⭐ Add an “Ask AI” button. Make it easy for students to use ChatGPT. Stop pretending that real-world problem solving is closed-book and solo. ⭐ Make test cases teach, not just grade. Automate the testing (with code or AI). Good test cases show students the kind of mistake they may - teaching them, not just grading them. That’s great for teachers to analyze, too. Test first, then teach from the mistakes. Let them solve problems first. Then teach them, focusing on what failed. AI does the work; humans handle what AI can’t. This lets us teach really useful skills based on real mistakes. 2. Make cheating pointless through design, not detection ...

When people ask me for connections, I share my LinkedIn data and ask them to pick. This week, three people asked for AI ideas. I shared my local content with AI coding agents and asked them to pick. STEP 1: Give access to content. I use a Dockerfile and script to isolate coding agents. To give access, I run: dev.sh -v /home/sanand/code/blog/:/home/sanand/code/blog/:ro \ -v /home/sanand/code/til:/home/sanand/code/til:ro \ -v /home/sanand/Dropbox/notes/transcripts:/home/sanand/Dropbox/notes/transcripts:ro This gives read-only access to my blog, things I learned, transcripts, and I can add more. (My transcripts are private, the rest are public.) ...

While exploring resonant computing tools, I discovered SearXNG, a self-hostable metasearch engine, which aggregates results from multiple search engines. It lets you search using APIs without needing to buy API keys and without being tracked. Pretty useful for research, people discovery, etc. when combined with LLMs. Setting it up for API use seems easy (thought Gemini got it wrong twice): cat <<EOF > settings.yml use_default_settings: true server: secret_key: "local_dummy_secret_key_987654321" search: formats: - html - json EOF docker run -d \ -p 8080:8080 \ --name searxng \ -v "$(pwd)/settings.yml:/etc/searxng/settings.yml" \ -e "SEARXNG_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080/" \ -e "SEARXNG_SERVER_LIMITER=false" \ searxng/searxng Now, you can run: ...

I was at a panel on AI in SDLC at PyConf. Here’s the summary of my advice: Process Make AI your entire SDLC loop. Record client calls, feed them to a coding agent to directly build & deploy the solution. Record your prompts, run post-mortems, and distill them into SKILLS.md files for reuse. Prompting Ask AI to make output more reviewable. Don’t waste time reviewing unclear output. Prefer directional feedback (feeling, emotion, intent) over implementational. Also give AI freedom to do things its way. Learn from that - you’ll be surprised. Learning ...