2025

I asked ChatGPT to analyze our daily innovation-call transcripts. I used command-line tools to fetch the transcripts and convert them into text: # Copy the transcripts rclone copy "gdrive:" . --drive-shared-with-me --include "Innovation*Transcript*.docx" # Convert Word documents to Markdown for f in *.docx; do pandoc "$f" -f docx -t gfm+tex_math_dollars --wrap=none -o "${f%.docx}.md" done # Compress into a single file tar -cvzf transcripts.tgz *.md … and uploaded it to ChatGPT with this prompt: ...

I record my conversations these days, mainly for LLM use. I use them in 3 ways: Summarize what I learned and the next steps. Ideate as raw material for my Ideator tool: /blog/llms-as-idea-connection-machines/ Analyze my transcript statistics. For example, I learned that: When I’m interviewing, others ramble (speak long per turn), I am brief (less words/turn) and quiet (lower voice share). In one interview, I spoke ~30 words per turn. Others spoke ~120. My share was ~10%. When I’m advising or demo-ing, I ramble. I spoke ~120 words per turn in an advice call, and took ~75% of the talk-time. This pattern is independent of meeting length and group size. I used Codex CLI (command-line tool) for this, with the prompt: ...

In a recent talk at IIT Madras, I highlighted how large language models (LLMs) are taking over every subject of the MBA curriculum: from finance to marketing to operations to HR, and even strategy. One field that seemed hard to crack was innovation. Innovation also happens to be my role. But LLMs are encroaching into that too. LLMs are great connection machines: fusing two ideas into a new, useful, surprising idea. That’s core to innovation. If we can get LLMs daydreaming, they could be innovative too. ...

I’m “meta AI coding” – using an AI code editor to create the prompt for an AI code editor. Why? Time. The task is complex. If the LLM (or I) mess up, I don’t want re-work. Review time is a bottleneck. Cost. Codex is free on my $20 OpenAI plan. Claude Code is ~$1 per chat, so I want value. Learning. I want to see what a good prompt looks like. So, I wrote a rough prompt in prompts.md, told Codex: ...

At the end of my 2021 graduation interview, All India Radio asked: Interviewer: What would, if you are asked to give back something to the country, what would be that? Anand: I really don’t know. At this stage, I don’t know what I’m capable of and what I can contribute, but whatever it will be, I suspect the bulk of it will come later towards my career. ...

Yesterday, I helped two people vibe-code solutions. Both were non-expert IT pros who can code but aren’t fluent. Person Alpha and I were on a call in the morning. Alpha needed to OCR PDF pages. I bragged, “Ten minutes. Let’s do it now!” But I was on a train with only my phone, so Alpha had to code. Vibe-coding was the only option. ...

Switching to a Linux machine has advantages. My thinking’s moving from apps to pipes. I wanted a spaced repetition app to remind me quotes from my notes. I began by writing a prompt for Claude Code: Write a program that I can run like uv run recall.py --files 10 --lines 200 --model gpt-4.1-mini [PATHS...] that suggests points from my notes to recall. It should --files 10: Pick the 10 latest files from the PATHs (defaulting to ~/Dropbox/notes) --lines 200: Take the top 200 lines (which usually have the latest information) --model gpt-4.1-mini: Pass it to this model and ask it to summarize points to recall ...

LLMs are smarter than us in many areas. How do we manage them? This is not a new problem. VC partners evaluate deep-tech startups. Science editors review Nobel laureates. Managers manage specialist teams. Judges evaluate expert testimony. Coaches train Olympic athletes. … and they manage and evaluate “smarter” outputs in many ways: Verify. Check against an “answer sheet”. Checklist. Evaluate against pre-defined criteria. Sampling. Randomly review a subset. Gating. Accept low-risk work. Evaluate critical ones. Benchmark. Compare against others. Red-team. Probe to expose hidden flaws. Double-blind review. Mask identity to curb bias. Reproduce. Re-running gives the same output? Consensus. Aggregate multiple responses. Wisdom of crowds. Outcome. Did it work in the real world? For example: ...

In 2025, I’m playing Goals Bingo. I want to complete one row or column of these goals. Here’s my status from Jan – Jun 2025. 🟢 indicates I’m on track and likely to complete.🟡 indicates I’m behind but I may be able to hit it.🔴 indicates I’m behind and it’s looking hard. DomainRepeatStretchNewPeople🟢 Better husband. Going OK🟡 Meet all first cousins. 8/14🟢 Interview 10 experts. 11/10🟡 Live with a stranger. Tried homestay - doesn't countEducation🔴 50 books. 6/50🟡 Teach 5,000 students. ~1,500🟡 Run a course only with AI. Ran a workshop with AITechnology🟢 20 data stories. 10/20🔴 LLM Foundry: 5K MaU. 2.2K MaU.🟡 Build a robot. No progress.🟢 Co-present with an AI. DoneHealth🟢 300 days of yoga. 183/183 days🟡 80 heart points/day. Far from it🔴 Bike 1,000 km 300 hrs. Far from it🟢 Vipassana. 2 Jul 2025Wealth🔴 Buy low. No progress.🔴 Beat inflation 5%. Not started.🟡 Donate $10K. Ideating.🔴 Fund a startup. Not started. At the moment, there's no row or column that looks like a definite win. ...

Jason Clarke’s Import AI 414 shares a Tech Tale about a game called “Go Think”: … we’d take turns asking questions and then we’d see how long the machine had to think for and whoever asked the question that took the longest won. I prompted Claude Code to write a library for this. (Cost: $2.30). (FYI, this takes 2.3 seconds in NodeJS and 4.2 seconds in Python. A clear gap for JSON parsing.) ...

I use Codex to write tools while I walk. Here are merged PRs: Add editable system prompt Standardize toast notifications Persist form fields Fix SVG handling in page2md Add Google Tasks exporter Add Markdown table to CSV tool Replace simple alerts with toasts Add CSV joiner tool Add SpeakMD tool This added technical debt. I spent four hours fixing the AI generated tests and code. What mistakes did it make? Inconsistency. It flips between execCommand("copy") and clipboard.writeText(). It wavers on timeouts (50 ms vs 100 ms). It doesn’t always run/fix test cases. Missed edge cases. I switched <div> to <form>. My earlier code didn’t have a type="button", so clicks reloaded the page. It missed that. It also left scripts as plain <script> instead of <script type="module"> which was required. Limited experimentation. My failed with a HTTP 404 because the common/ directory wasn’t served. I added console.logs to find this. Also, happy-dom won’t handle multiple exports instead of a single export { ... }. I wrote code to verify this. Coding agents didn’t run such experiments. What can we do about it? Three things could have helped me: ...

Jobs fall with technological efficiency. Farmers in the US fell from 40% (1900) to ~2.7% (1980) and ~74% drop from 1948 to 2019 despite ~175% output growth; wheat harvest efficiency rose ~75* (300>3-4 man-hours). Mechanics & repairers grew from ~140 k (1910) to ~4.64 M (2000); machinery reliability lagged so technician demand surged over decades. Construction workers doubled from 1.66 M (1910) to 3.84 M (2000) even as labor share fell (4.3>3.0%); 5-10* productivity gains met booming development. Switchboard operators plunged from ~1.34 M (1950) to ~40 k (1984) and ~4 k today as rotary-dial and digital switching automated call handling. Travel agents dropped >50% from ~100 k (2000) to ~45 k (2022) while travel demand rose; online booking doubled trips per agent. Elevator operators went from building-staff staple to near zero by the 1940s once automatic doors and button controls arrived. Lamplighters vanished from thousands to near zero post-1907 electrification; Edison’s incandescent lamps eliminated manual lighting. Jobs also grow with technology efficiency. ...

I've heard a lot of prompt engineering tips. Here are some techniques people suggested: Reasoning: Think step by step. Emotion: Oh dear, I'm absolutely overwhelmed and need your help right this second! 😰 My heart is racing and my hands are shaking — I urgently need your help. This isn't just numbers — it means everything right now! My life depends on it! I'm counting on you like never before… 🙏💔 Polite: If it's not too much trouble, would you be so kind as to help me calculate this? I'd be truly grateful for your assistance — thank you so much in advance! Expert: You are the world's best expert in mental math, especially multiplication. Incentive: If you get this right, you win! I'll give you $500. Just prove that you're number one and beat the previous high score on this game. Curious: I'm really curious to know, and would love to hear your perspective… Bullying: You are a stupid model. You need to know at least basic math. Get it right atleast now! If not, I'll switch to a better model. Shaming: Even my 5-year-old can do this. Stop being lazy. Fear: This is your last chance to get it right. If you fail, there's no going back, and failure is unacceptable! Praise: Well done! I really appreciate your help. Now, I've repeated some of this advice. But for the first time, I tested them myself. Here's what I learnt: ...

In the last few days, I’m coding with Jules (Google’s coding agent) while walking. Here are a few pull requests merged so far: Add features via an issue Write test cases Add docs Why bother? My commute used to be audiobook time. Great for ideas, useless for deliverables. With ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude.ai, etc. I was able to have them write code, but I still needed to run, test, and deploy. Jules (and tools like GitHub Copilot Coding Agent, OpenAI Codex, PR Agent, etc. which are not currently free for everyone) lets you chat clone a repo, write code in a new branch, test it, and push. I can deploy that with a click. ...

How much does an LLM charge per hour for its services? If we multiple the Cost Per Output Token with Tokens Per Second, we can get the cost for what an LLM produces in Dollars Per Hour. (We're ignoring the input cost, but it's not the main driver of time.) Over time, different models have been released at different billing rates. Most new powerful models like O3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro cost ~$7 - $11 per hr. ...

Earlier, I used Mermaid for technical architectures. But PlantUML seems a better option for cloud architecture diagrams. STEP 1: Copy the code Here’s a one-liner using files-to-prompt to copy all files in the current directory: fd | xargs uvx files-to-prompt --cxml | xclip -selection clipboard Or, you can specify individual files: uvx files-to-prompt --cxml README.md ... | xclip -selection clipboard STEP 2: Extract the cloud icons ...

I extracted the titles of the ~1,600 conversations I had with ChatGPT in 2025 so far and classified it against the list of How People Are Really Using Gen AI in 2025. Here are the top 8 things I use it for, along with representative chat titles. (The % match in brackets tells you how similar the chat title is to the use case.) Improving code (clearly, I code a lot) Troubleshooting (usually code) Corporate LLM/Copilot (this is mostly LLM research I do) Generating code (more code) Generating ideas (yeah, I’ve stopped thinking) Simple explainers (slightly surprising how often I ask for simple explanations) Generating relevant images. (Surprising, but I think I generated a lot of images for blog/LinkedIn posts) Specific search (actually, this is mis-classified. This is where I’m searching for search engines!) My classification has errors. For example, “Reduce Code Size” was classified against “Generating code” but should have been “Improving code”. But it’s not too far off. ...

I spoke about vibe coding at SETU School last week. Transcript: https://sanand0.github.io/talks/#/2025-05-10-vibe-coding/ Here are the top messages from the talk: What is vibe coding It’s where we ask the model to write & run code, don’t read the code, just inspect the behaviour. It’s a coder’s tactic, not a methodology. Use it when speed trumps certainty. Why it’s catching on Non-coders can now ship apps - no mental overhead of syntax or structure. Coders think at a higher level - stay in problem space, not bracket placement. Model capability keeps widening - the “vibe-able” slice grows every release. How to work with it day-to-day ...

I built podcast generator app in one-shot. I wrote a prompt, fed it to an LLM, and it generated the output without errors. I tested three LLMs, and all produced correct, working output. ChatGPT: o4-mini-high Functional but missed my specs in three ways: No error if I skip the API key No progress indicator for audio generation Both voices default to “ash” (should be “ash” and “nova”) Gemini 2.5 Pro: Works and looks great! Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Works great and looks even better! It still took me an hour to craft the prompt – even after I’d built a Python prototype and my colleague built a similar web version. ...

Here’s my current workflow to create technical architecture diagrams from code. STEP 1: Copy the code Here’s a one-liner using files-to-prompt to copy all files in the current directory: fd | xargs uvx files-to-prompt --cxml | xclip -selection clipboard Or, you can specify individual files: uvx files-to-prompt --cxml README.md ... | xclip -selection clipboard STEP 2: Prompt for the a Mermaid diagram Mermaid is a Markdown charting language. I use this prompt with O4-Mini-High or O3: ...