2025

I have this nagging feeling (maybe you do too?) that it’s cheating and I’m not really learning if it’s so easy. The same voice makes me feel guilty when using coding agents to code or ChatGPT in meetings. I’m telling that voice to relax. I upload books to Claude and ask it to “Comprehensively and engagingly summarize and fact-check, writing in Malcolm Gladwell’s style, the book …”. I can read it in an hour instead of twelve. Four bullet points instead of forty. With (this surprised me) roughly the same number of insights I actually do something with. ...

In 1995, I wrote down the specs for my "dream machine". Comparing it against the machine I have today: Item19952025IncreaseRAM32 MB64 GB2000GPU RAM16 MB8 GB500HDD4 GB1 TB250HDD speed10 MB/s2 GB/s200Processor150 MHz5.10 GHz34Monitor21"27"1.3Resolution2048x15361920x12000.73 Clearly, RAM has seen the biggest growth. Low cost, high demand.Followed by the hard disk - both on capacity and speed. The processor speed increase, in comparison, is modest. What's surprising is that my monitor today isn't that much bigger than what I wanted. The resolution is actually lower than what I wanted 30 years ago! Clearly, I overestimated how important screen resolution would be. ...

“Humans can be held to account. Not AI.” I hear this often. But it’s not true. Corporations are non-human, but they can enter into contracts and face criminal charges. Ships can be sued directly. Courts can arrest the vessel itself. Deities and temples in India can own property. Forests and rivers in New Zealand, Colombia, Spain, have been granted legal personhood. Medieval Europe has held animal trials (e.g. for “guilty” pigs). ...

It’s incredible how far coding agents have come. They can now solve complete exams. That changes what we should measure. My Tools in Data Science course has a Remote Online Exam. It was so difficult that, in 2023, it sparked threads titled “What is the purpose of an impossible ROE?” Today, despite making the test harder, students solve it easily with Claude, ChatGPT, etc. Here’s today’s score distribution: ...

The OpenAI text-to-speech cost documentation is confusing. As of 2 Nov 2025: GPT-4o mini TTS costs $0.60 / MTok input and $12.00 / MTok audio output according to the model page and the pricing page. They also estimate this to be ~1.5c per minute - both for input and output. It supports up to 2,000 tokens input. TTS-1 costs $15 / MTok speech generated according to the model page but the pricing page says it's $15 / MChars. No estimate per minute is provided. Is supports up to 4,096 characters input. TTS-1 HD is twice as expensive as TTS-1 I wanted to find the approximate total cost for a typical text input measured per character and token. ...

I charted the OpenAI GDPVal paper with industry compensation as the size and AI augmentation as color. Big green areas are we’re paying people where AI does better. Click here to see the interactive visualization. Clicking to see some actual tasks compared. I use this to check whom to ask advice: AI or professional. AI beats Personal Financial Advisors ~64% of the time. So I invested half my money using ChatGPT’s recommendation. (UTI Nifty 50, if you’re curious.) ...

I don’t charge for workshops. Altruism? No: it’s self-interest. “If you’re not paying for it, you’re not the customer; you’re the product being sold.” Andrew Lewis, via Tim O’Reilly, 2010. My workshop process is designed to benefit me first. I pick topics I want to learn, not stuff useful to the audience. Example: I picked DuckDB for my PyCon India 2025 talk to learn it. ...

I was testing LLMs’ sense of Tamil humor with this quote: Extend this post with more funny Tamil words that end with .ai - mentioning why they’re funny. Chenn.ai is the artificial intelligence capital of India. Kadal.ai Kad.ai Dos.ai Vad.ai Ad.ai Thal.ai Mallig.ai Aratt.ai And finally Podad.ai All spoken in namma bash.ai 😅 The Chinese models didn’t fare well. DeepSeek made up words. Mood.ai - An AI that perfectly captures your mood. Sokk.ai - The AI for when you’re bored. Thanni.ai - A hydration assistant. Qwen too. ...

Can ChatGPT give teachers data-driven heuristics on student grades? I uploaded last term’s scores from about 1,700 students in my Tools in Data Science course and asked ChatGPT: This sheet contains the scores of students … (and explained the columns). I want to find out what are the best predictors of the total plus bonus… (and explained how scores are calculated). I am looking for simple statements with 80%+ correctness along the lines of: ...

Last weekend, I fed Codex my browser history and said “explore.” It found a pattern I call rabbit holes – three ways we browse: Linear spiral - one page > next page > next. E.g. filing income tax, clicking “next” on the PyCon schedule. Hub & spoke - hub > open tabs > back to hub. E.g. exploring DHH’s Ubuntu setup, checking Firebase config. Wide survey - source > many, many pages. E.g. clearing inbox, scanning news. Then Claude Code built this lovely data story. ...

Yesterday, I discovered how much reasoning improves model quality. My Tools in Data Science assignment asks students to draft an llms.txt file for ipify and auto-checks with GPT-5 Nano - a fast, cheap reasoning model. I set reasoning_effort to minimal and ran this checklist: 1. Starts with "# ipify" and explains ipify. 2. Markdown sections on API access, support (e.g. GitHub, libraries). 3. Covers API endpoints (IPv4, IPv6, universal) and formats (text, JSON, JSONP). 4. Mentions free, no-auth usage, availability, open-source, safeguards. 5. Has maintenance metadata (e.g. "Last updated: <Month YYYY>"). 6. Mentions robots.txt alignment. Stay concise (no filler, <= ~15 links). If even one checklist item is missing or wrong, fail it. Respond with EXACTLY one line: PASS - <brief justification> or FAIL - <brief explanation of the first failed item>. With a perfect llms.txt, it claimed “Metadata section is missing” and “JSONP not mentioned” – though both were present. ...

There hasn’t been a box-office explosion like Dangal in the history of Bollywood. CPI inflation-adjusted to 2024, it is the only film in the ₹3,000 Cr club. 3 Idiots (2009) is the first member of the ₹1,000 Cr club (2024-inflation-adjusted). The hot streak was 2013-2017: each year, a film crossed that bar: Dhoom 3, PK, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Dangal, Secret Superstar. Since then, we never saw such a release except in 2023 (Jawan, Pathan). ...

Here’s how I track trending GitHub repos each week. I run a scheduled script that saves a clean TSV I can scan fast. It uses uvx gtrending to fetch weekly trending repos for: Rust: High-quality system tools. (Anything in Rust seems cool.) Go: Reliable CLI/infra tools. (Like Rust, most Go code seems good.) Python: Most AI/ML stuff TypeScript: Most modern JS codebases JavaScript: Most front-end utilities Shell: Productivity scripts I pipe results through jq to extract: ...

I’ve started vibe shopping, i.e. using ChatGPT to shop for small, daily items and buying without verifying. For example: “A metal rack for the floor: at least 2 ft * 1 ft * 2 ft, small gaps, popular options on Amazon.in.” https://chatgpt.com/share/68d61d68-7040-800c-936b-354749539308 “An optical wired mouse that’s smaller than usual, 4*+, popular, Prime-eligible for Chennai by the weekend on Amazon.in.” https://chatgpt.com/share/68d61e0d-420c-800c-bc71-821b9f9296a9 The best use is when I don’t know the right terms. In this case, the terms were wire rack and mini mouse. ...

Here are the 10 most frequent sites I use (based on Microsoft Edge’s home bar): ChatGPT. It replaced Google as my default knowledge source. I prefer it over Gemini, Claude, etc. because the app has good features (memory from past conversations, code interpreter, strong voice mode, remote MCP on web app, etc.) The OpenAI models have pros and cons, but the app features are ahead of competition. Gmail. It’s my work inbox. Interestingly, I check it more (and respond faster) than social channels (e.g. WhatsApp, Google Chat, LinkedIn). It also doubles up as my task queue. Prime Video. I mainly watch The Mentalist. Totally love Patrick Jane! Google AI Studio. Mostly for transcription. It’s better than Gemini on UI, ability to handle uploads, file-formats, etc. It’s also free (though the data is used for training.) My Talks page. I give 1-1.5 talks a week, mostly on AI/ML topics. I use Marp to render Markdown slides and publish it here. Google Chat. It’s Straive’s social channel. I can’t use it from my phone, so I log in only if I need to check if I missed something. LinkedIn. It’s where I post by default. I don’t use it for networking and only connect with people I’ve met and know well. YouTube. Mostly for movie clips over dinner. I occasionally watch educational content. Playground. LLM Foundry is Straive’s internal gateway to multiple model APIs (I built it). I use it to experiment with models, grab API keys, and demo LLMs to clients. Squoosh. I compress every image, every time. Mostly into WebP (hands-down the best format today), typically lossless with an 8-color palette, or lossy at ~0-10% quality for photos. That’s my current home row. It will change. But the reasons probably won’t: fast, simple, automatable, and practical (for me).

In Feb 2025 at PyConf Hyderabad, I tried a new slide format: command-line slideshows in bash. I’ve used this format in more talks since then: LLMs in the CLI, PyCon Singapore, Jun 2025 Agents in the CLI, Singapore Python User Group, Jul 2025 DuckDB is the new Pandas, PyCon India, Sep 2025 It’s my favorite format. I can demo code without breaking the presentation flow. It also draws interest. My setup was the top question in my PyCon talk. ...

25 years ago, Mr. Krishnan (IAS) amused us with anecdotes of bureaucrats writing meeting minutes before the meeting. This week, I flipped that. I wrote slides after the talk. I call them AfterSlides. Why. I ran a couple of Ask-Me-Anything (AMA) sessions where the audience set the agenda. I learned their interests. They got answers. No slides prepared. How. I okayed recording with the organizers, recorded on my phone, transcribed with Gemini, and asked ChatGPT to generate the AfterSlides. ...

In 2001, I received a campus interview invitation from BCG. It opened like this: Dear Anand, We’d like to invite you to an interview on … We were impressed by your … … and went on to share 2-3 phrases about what they liked about my CV. A dozen of us got similar letters – each personalized! That was cool. Two decades later, I still remember it. It showed care and competence – care enough to personalize for each candidate, competence to pull it off at scale across campuses. ...

Jaidev’s The Bridge of Asses reminded me of my first coding bridge. It was 1986. I’d completed class 6 and was in a summer coding camp at school. M Kothandaraman (“MK Sir”) was teaching us how to swap variables in BASIC on the BBC Micro. This code prints the first name in alphabetical order (“Alice”): 10 A = "Bob" 20 B = "Alice" 30 IF A > B THEN 40 TEMP = A 50 A = B 60 B = TEMP 70 END 80 PRINT A The homework was to print all details of the first alphabetical name: ...