<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>pagerank on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/pagerank/</link>
    <description>Recent content in pagerank on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/pagerank/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Improving pagerank</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/improving-pagerank/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/improving-pagerank/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good guidelines on &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.ssw.com.au/SSW/Standards/Rules/RulestoBetterGoogleRankings.aspx&#34;&gt;improving pagerank&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.lazygeek.net/archives/2006/03/digged.html&#34;&gt;via LazyGeek&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>nofollow tag</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/nofollow-tag/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/nofollow-tag/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/1/19/35627/2443&#34;&gt;impact of &amp;lsquo;rel=nofollow&amp;rsquo; tag&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or, perhaps, some prominent webloggers will use &amp;ldquo;nofollow&amp;rdquo; as a money-making technique: for a fee, they&amp;rsquo;ll take the &amp;ldquo;nofollow&amp;rdquo; off your link and let you have their PageRank.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with PageRank</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/problems-with-pagerank/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/problems-with-pagerank/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recognising the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/33141.html&#34;&gt;problems with PageRank&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.robotwisdom.com&#34;&gt;via RobotWisdom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google PageRank is 5 times faster</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-pagerank-is-5-times-faster/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2003 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-pagerank-is-5-times-faster/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google is fiddling around with algorithms to make &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.newsisfree.com/click/-4,18076120,1440/&#34;&gt;PageRank 5 times faster&lt;/a&gt;. Wonder why they want to do it. The article mentions something about personalised search engines, but I don&amp;rsquo;t quite get it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>About PageRank</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/about-pagerank/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/about-pagerank/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.supportforums.org/pagerank&#34;&gt;About PageRank&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google PageRank</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-pagerank/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-pagerank/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.searchnerd.com/pagerank/&#34;&gt;On figuring Google&amp;rsquo;s pagerank&lt;/a&gt;. It&amp;rsquo;s interesting to note that Google, and only Google, ranks 11 out of 10 in its pagerank.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google-watch</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-watch/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-watch/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.google-watch.org/&#34;&gt;Google-watch&lt;/a&gt; is against Google, because they&amp;rsquo;re unfair, and don&amp;rsquo;t respect privacy (via &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/08/29/google_watch/index.html&#34;&gt;Salon&lt;/a&gt;). I still don&amp;rsquo;t mind, as long as I get good search results. But this &amp;ldquo;unfair&amp;rdquo; part I kind-of agree with. Wish Google would search recently updated sites better. And they&amp;rsquo;ve also got a point about the ordering. Sometimes, I &lt;strong&gt;would&lt;/strong&gt; like to see the &amp;ldquo;less important&amp;rdquo; (low pagerank) sites on top.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PigeonRank</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/pigeonrank/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/pigeonrank/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html&#34;&gt;PigeonRank&lt;/a&gt;. Google&amp;rsquo;s amazing technology (funny).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google paper</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-paper/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-paper/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The original &lt;a href=&#34;http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html&#34;&gt;Google paper&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
