<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>network-theory on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/network-theory/</link>
    <description>Recent content in network-theory on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/network-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Small world project</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/small-world-project/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/small-world-project/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://smallworld.columbia.edu&#34;&gt;Small world&lt;/a&gt; &amp;ndash; this project from Columbia University finds that while there are probably less than 6 degrees, the network entertains requests for favours only about a third of the time, and that it&amp;rsquo;s not as hub-and-spoke as scale-free networks would have us imagine. &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/12/science/12MAIL.html?pagewanted=2&amp;amp;ei=5062&amp;amp;en=a02eff2d6e9081f5&amp;amp;ex=1061265600&#34;&gt;via NYTimes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Growth Form Function and Crashes</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/growth-form-function-and-crashes/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/growth-form-function-and-crashes/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Bulletins/bulletinFall00/features/cosma.html&#34;&gt;Growth, Form, Function, and Crashes&lt;/a&gt;: an article from the Santa Fe institute. It explains scale-free fairly well. The point is, scale-free networks have a few hubs. If you knock a hub out, the network is fragmented. But your chance of knocking a hub out by random is small, since there are so few of them. That makes scale-free networks reliable as well as vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slightly more technical details at &lt;a href=&#34;http://physicsweb.org/article/world/14/7/09&#34;&gt;PhysicsWeb&lt;/a&gt; by the creators of scale-free networks. It also says that if you &lt;strong&gt;design&lt;/strong&gt; a network, it may not be scale-free. But if you &lt;strong&gt;let it evolve&lt;/strong&gt;, it probably will be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Internet is a scale free network</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-internet-is-a-scale-free-network/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-internet-is-a-scale-free-network/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1365118&#34;&gt;The Internet is a scale free network&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
