<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>internet-law on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/internet-law/</link>
    <description>Recent content in internet-law on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2001 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/internet-law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Permission to link to KPMG</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/permission-to-link-to-kpmg/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/permission-to-link-to-kpmg/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Funny. KPMG requires permission even to &lt;a href=&#34;http://chris.raettig.org/email/jnl00036.html&#34;&gt;link to their site&lt;/a&gt;. I think I have a link to them somewhere in my site&amp;hellip; should I ask?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obey US laws on the Internet</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/obey-us-laws-on-the-internet/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/obey-us-laws-on-the-internet/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Technology sure does give the US an advantage. US companies don&amp;rsquo;t have to &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-7815683.html&#34;&gt;obey French law&lt;/a&gt;, but the US can &lt;a href=&#34;http://robots.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/11/22/policing.the.internet.ap/index.html&#34;&gt;prosecute the French&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anti DMCA</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/anti-dmca/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/anti-dmca/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://anti-dmca.org/&#34;&gt;Anti DMCA&lt;/a&gt; is against the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legality of illegal MP3s</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/legality-of-illegal-mp3s/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/legality-of-illegal-mp3s/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sweden has &lt;a href=&#34;http://slashdot.org/yro/99/12/28/0814212.shtml&#34;&gt;ruled&lt;/a&gt; that it&amp;rsquo;s OK to have links to illegal MP3s, so long as the server is in a country where illegal MP3s are legal. That&amp;rsquo;s in stark contrast with &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2656099,00.html&#34;&gt;France vs Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;. In fact, the norm is that linking even to the front page of commercial sites &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.llrx.com/features/weblink1.htm&#34;&gt;needs permission&lt;/a&gt; sometimes. A court in Utah &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cnn.com/1999/TECH/computing/12/13/illegal.links.idg/&#34;&gt;ruled&lt;/a&gt; that providing links to copyrighted material could constitute copyright infringement. Better check out &lt;a href=&#34;http://law.about.com/newsissues/law/msub34.htm?once=true&amp;amp;&#34;&gt;cyberlaws&lt;/a&gt; and ensure compliance with &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.fplc.edu/tfield/cOpyNet.htm&#34;&gt;copyright rules on the Internet&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Violation is often in the eye of the beholder. &amp;ldquo;Anyone who makes derogatory references to others (or their sites, products or services), however it is done, invites trouble.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No civil rights in the US</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/no-civil-rights-in-the-us/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2000 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/no-civil-rights-in-the-us/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;CNet argues that on the Internet (in the US), you have just about &lt;a href=&#34;http://home.cnet.com/techtrends/0-1544321-7-2181834.html&#34;&gt;no civil rights&lt;/a&gt;. Among other things, your employer can monitor your web surfing and e-mail &amp;ndash; even at home.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>e-signature law signed</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/e-signature-law-signed/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/e-signature-law-signed/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Clinton signed the &lt;a href=&#34;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000630/pl/clinton_digital_dc_4.html&#34;&gt;e-signature law&lt;/a&gt;. To be implemented in October, it&amp;rsquo;s an interesting contrast to our &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.mit.gov.in/it-bill.htm&#34;&gt;IT Bill&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
