<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>intelligence on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/intelligence/</link>
    <description>Recent content in intelligence on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/intelligence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Wisdom and Intelligence</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/wisdom-and-intelligence/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/wisdom-and-intelligence/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Graham pens another brilliant essay on &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.paulgraham.com/wisdom.html&#34;&gt;Is it worth being wise&lt;/a&gt;? It&amp;rsquo;s mostly about the difference between being wise (right most of the time) versus being smart (being right where few others are). If you&amp;rsquo;re picking between options, being wise is useful. There is a best option, and you&amp;rsquo;ll pick it most of the time. If you&amp;rsquo;re doing something creative, there&amp;rsquo;s no finite set of options. Then it&amp;rsquo;s worth being smart. Increasingly, tasks are asking for more creativity, so it may be better to be smart.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Brain and Turing Machines</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-brain-and-turing-machines/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-brain-and-turing-machines/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent kuro5hin article on &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/3/15/15956/6995&#34;&gt;the brain and Turing machines&lt;/a&gt;. While on brains, kuro5hin also talks about &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/3/17/55544/4953&#34;&gt;geniuses&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does education really pay</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/does-education-really-pay/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/does-education-really-pay/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2002/1125/124.html?_requestid=134&#34;&gt;Does education really pay?&lt;/a&gt; An interesting article on Forbes arguing that education does not &lt;strong&gt;cause&lt;/strong&gt; higher salaries, but is merely correlated with it. The logic sequence is broadly:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Labour markets want smart people.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Smart people tend to want education.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Hence labour markets appear to want educated people.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Machiavellian Intelligence</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/machiavellian-intelligence/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/machiavellian-intelligence/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&#34;http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS/Entry/whiten&#34;&gt;Machiavellian Intelligence&lt;/a&gt; hypothesis says that the brain evolved more for its social purpose, than for finding food and things like that. Incidentally, Google&amp;rsquo;s collection on &lt;a href=&#34;http://directory.google.com/Top/Science/Biology/Evolution/&#34;&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt; is as comprehensive as ever.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
