<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>google-answers on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/google-answers/</link>
    <description>Recent content in google-answers on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/google-answers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Bias among search engines</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/bias-among-search-engines/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/bias-among-search-engines/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/05/the_dog_that_di.php&#34;&gt;Search engines rank their own sites better&lt;/a&gt;. Yahoo Answers ranks higher on Yahoo, but not on MSN or Google. Google Answers ranks high on Google, but not on Yahoo or MSN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is bias, but not necessarily evil. They may just be fooling themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even scientists, the genuinely objective ones, do this. As Feynman points out in &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.physics.brocku.ca/etc/cargo_cult_science.html&#34;&gt;Cargo Cult Science&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Millikan measured the charge on an electron by an experiment with falling oil drops, and got an answer which we now know not to be quite right. It&amp;rsquo;s a little bit off because he had the incorrect value for the viscosity of air. It&amp;rsquo;s interesting to look at the history of measurements of the charge of an electron, after Millikan. If you plot them as a function of time, you find that one is a little bit bigger than Millikan&amp;rsquo;s, and the next one&amp;rsquo;s a little bit bigger than that, and the next one&amp;rsquo;s a little bit bigger than that, until finally they settle down to a number which is higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why didn&amp;rsquo;t they discover the new number was higher right away? It&amp;rsquo;s a thing that scientists are ashamed of - this history - because it&amp;rsquo;s apparent that people did things like this: When they got a number that was too high above Millikan&amp;rsquo;s, they thought something must be wrong - and they would look for and find a reason why something might be wrong. When they got a number close to Millikan&amp;rsquo;s value they didn&amp;rsquo;t look so hard. And so they eliminated the numbers that were too far off, and did other things like that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, (and this is the important part):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&amp;rsquo;ve learned those tricks nowadays, and now we don&amp;rsquo;t have that kind of a disease. But this long history of learning how to not fool ourselves&amp;ndash;of having utter scientific integrity &amp;ndash; is, I&amp;rsquo;m sorry to say, something that we haven&amp;rsquo;t specifically included in any particular course that I know of. We just hope you&amp;rsquo;ve caught on by osmosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not easy to catch on, by osmosis or otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The best Google Answers</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-best-google-answers/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-best-google-answers/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&#34;http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=204301&#34;&gt;Best Google Answers&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Google answers works</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/how-google-answers-works/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/how-google-answers-works/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good article on &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/oct02/west.htm&#34;&gt;how Google Answers works&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately, the guy who wrote it was &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.librarian.net/surreal.shtml&#34;&gt;fired from Google Answers&lt;/a&gt;. (Incidentally, this &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.fortune.com/indext.jhtml?channel=print_article.jhtml&amp;amp;doc_id=209291&#34;&gt;Fortune article&lt;/a&gt; mentions that Google makes over $100 mn a year. That&amp;rsquo;s incredible!) &lt;a href=&#34;http://google.blogspace.com&#34;&gt;via GoogleBlog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lsquo;A frequent visitor&amp;rsquo; wrote in asking if I meant &amp;lsquo;guy&amp;rsquo; as in &amp;lsquo;guy or girl&amp;rsquo;, because the person who wrote it is a girl. I &lt;strong&gt;didn&amp;rsquo;t&lt;/strong&gt; know that. Thanks! (Wonder if that re-inforces the stereotype of the female librarian&amp;hellip;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google answers questions</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-answers-questions/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/google-answers-questions/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://answers.google.com/&#34;&gt;Google answers questions&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
