<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>free-speech on S Anand</title>
    <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/free-speech/</link>
    <description>Recent content in free-speech on S Anand</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.s-anand.net/blog/tag/free-speech/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Corporate statements and free speech</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/corporate-statements-and-free-speech/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/corporate-statements-and-free-speech/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting legal conundrum. When Nike was accused of running sweatshops in Asia, it responded with press releases and ads claiming that it did not. Marc Kasky filed a case saying that &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1494838&#34;&gt;Nike was advertising unfairly&lt;/a&gt;, and won. Now corporates are raising the question of whether corporate statements are free speech, and can be similarly protected.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DeCSS haikus</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/decss-haikus/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/decss-haikus/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A truly inspired way of describing DeCSS: &lt;a href=&#34;http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/decss-haiku.txt&#34;&gt;DeCSS haikus&lt;/a&gt;. (I hope linking to it is not illegal.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DeCSS is legal</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/decss-is-legal/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/decss-is-legal/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Preliminary indications are good. &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/22613.html&#34;&gt;DeCSS is legal&lt;/a&gt; (so far.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Early hits of Sep 11 attack</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/early-hits-of-sep-11-attack/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/early-hits-of-sep-11-attack/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunate, but among the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/57/21836.html&#34;&gt;early hits&lt;/a&gt; of the attack are &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010921_eff_wiretap_alert.html&#34;&gt;privacy and free speech&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cracking DVDs</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/cracking-dvds/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/cracking-dvds/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Two MIT students have written a 7-line program that &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2693768,00.html&#34;&gt;unscrambles protected DVDs&lt;/a&gt;. It&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/&#34;&gt;downloadable&lt;/a&gt;. The legal issue is whether source code deserves protection on par with freedom of expression.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freedrive closes</title>
      <link>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/freedrive-closes/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.s-anand.net/blog/freedrive-closes/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Freedrive closes &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-201-4565328-0.html&#34;&gt;public storage space&lt;/a&gt;. Along with &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2895878.html&#34;&gt;Napster&lt;/a&gt;, that&amp;rsquo;s a nail in the coffin of free software. But what about the argument that &lt;a href=&#34;http://cryptome.org/mpaa-v-2600-bac.htm&#34;&gt;code is speech&lt;/a&gt;, and hence &amp;ldquo;free speech&amp;rdquo;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
