<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Beta 5 crashes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/</link>
	<description>Technology, business and fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: srvblooze</title>
		<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/comment-page-1/#comment-3470</link>
		<dc:creator>srvblooze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/#comment-3470</guid>
		<description>Yep, same here. I&#039;ve got a Mac (Leopard 10.5.7) and it&#039;s just out of control. I have to use Safari if I&#039;m doing something that requires no interruptions because Firefox 3.5 is not to be trusted. I spena considerable amount of time removing add-ons one at a time and then finally got gfed up and removed all of them. No change- the thing is a menace to time management. GRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, same here. I&#8217;ve got a Mac (Leopard 10.5.7) and it&#8217;s just out of control. I have to use Safari if I&#8217;m doing something that requires no interruptions because Firefox 3.5 is not to be trusted. I spena considerable amount of time removing add-ons one at a time and then finally got gfed up and removed all of them. No change- the thing is a menace to time management. GRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jiMMy</title>
		<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>jiMMy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>firefox 3.5b4 crashes randomly 3-4 times a day (~4 hrs use) - mostly flash related I think.
however firefox 3.0.10 did not crash much with the same flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox 3.5b4 crashes randomly 3-4 times a day (~4 hrs use) &#8211; mostly flash related I think.<br />
however firefox 3.0.10 did not crash much with the same flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Glad I&#039;m not the only one seeing the crashes with beta 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I&#8217;m not the only one seeing the crashes with beta 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Florenzano</title>
		<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Florenzano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>I totally disagree. Also, your assumption that more google hits means more crashes is flawed. It&#039;s safe to assume that the higher number the beta, the more people will try to use it. I&#039;d be willing to bet that the correlation of number of users and number of google hits is fairly linear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally disagree. Also, your assumption that more google hits means more crashes is flawed. It&#8217;s safe to assume that the higher number the beta, the more people will try to use it. I&#8217;d be willing to bet that the correlation of number of users and number of google hits is fairly linear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talboito</title>
		<link>http://www.s-anand.net/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>talboito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/firefox-3-beta-5-crashes/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing a bunch of crashes too. Luckily it loads so much faster I don&#039;t even mind. Crash, reload, crash reload. The strange thing is that sites that crash the browser will reload perfectly fine. Also, nearly every word in this textbox has been marked as mispelled. Not sure if I have dictionaries installed correctly, but it sure looks weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing a bunch of crashes too. Luckily it loads so much faster I don&#8217;t even mind. Crash, reload, crash reload. The strange thing is that sites that crash the browser will reload perfectly fine. Also, nearly every word in this textbox has been marked as mispelled. Not sure if I have dictionaries installed correctly, but it sure looks weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
